Figure 20

Articles
Journal
- Details
- Scope
- Editors
- Authors
Home

sidebar

"Low-Frequency Gravitational Wave Searches
Using Spacecraft Doppler Tracking"

J. W. Armstrong

	Abstract
1	Introduction
2	Notation, Acronyms, and Conventions
3	Gravitational Wave Signal Response
4	Apparatus and Principal Noise Sources
	4.1	Frequency standard noise
	4.2	Plasma scintillation noise
	4.3	Tropospheric scintillation noise
	4.4	Antenna mechanical noise
	4.5	Ground electronics noise
	4.6	Spacecraft transponder noise
	4.7	Thermal noise in the ground and spacecraft receivers
	4.8	Spacecraft unmodeled motion
	4.9	Numerical noise in orbit removal
	4.10	Aggregate spectrum
	4.11	Summary of noise levels and transfer functions
5	Signal Processing
	5.1	Noise spectrum estimation
	5.2	Sinusoidal and quasiperiodic waves
	5.3	Bursts
	5.4	Stochastic background
	5.5	Classification of data intervals based on transfer functions
	5.6	Frequency-time representations
	5.7	Qualifying/disqualifying candidates
	5.8	Other comments
6	Detector Performance
	6.1	Observations to date
	6.2	Near-future observations
	6.3	Sensitivity to periodic and quasi-periodic waves
	6.4	Burst waves
	6.5	Sensitivity to a stochastic background
7	Improving Doppler Tracking Sensitivity
8	The LISA Low-Frequency Detector
9	Concluding Comments
	Acknowledgements
	References
	Footnotes
	Updates
	Figures
	Tables

Figure 20: Sensitivity of the Cassini 2001 – 2002 gravitational wave observations, expressed as the equivalent sinusoidal strain sensitivity required to produce SNR = 1 for a randomly polarized isotropic background as a function of Fourier frequency. This reflects both the levels, spectral shapes, and transfer functions of the instrumental noises (see Section 4) and the GW transfer function (see Section 3). Black curve: sensitivity computed using smoothed version of observed noise spectrum; blue curve: sensitivity computed from pre-observation predicted noise spectrum [111].