3 Observations
By their very nature, relativistic binaries are compact and faint, so that observations of these systems are difficult unless they are in an interacting phase. Furthermore, observations of binaries that have segregated to the centers of clusters can be complicated by crowding issues. Nonetheless, observations across a broad spectrum using a variety of ground- and space-based telescopes have revealed populations of binaries and their tracers in many Milky Way and extra-galactic globular clusters. In a CMD of a globular cluster, some stars can be found on the main sequence above and to the left of
the turn-off (see Figure 6). These stars are known as blue stragglers. As their name suggests, if these stars
are coeval with the stellar population of the cluster, they are too hot and too massive and should have
evolved off the main sequence. They are thought to have been rejuvenated through mass transfer, merger, or
direct collision of binaries [129, 97, 377, 268, 369]. As such, they can be interpreted as tracers of binary
interactions within globular clusters. Recent observations of the blue straggler populations of 13 globular
clusters indicate a correlation between the specific frequency of blue stragglers and the binary
fraction in the globular cluster [441]. This supports observations which also seem to suggest
that binary coalescences are the dominant formation mechanism for blue stragglers in globular
clusters [291]. However, many of the populations that have been observed exhibit a bimodal radial
distribution [127, 488, 123, 414, 478, 286, 87, 42, 86] for which the inner population can be interpreted
as tracing dynamical interactions and the outer population as representative of the primordial binary
population.
Blue stragglers are some of the most visible and populous evidence of the dynamical interactions that
can also give rise to relativistic binaries. Current observations that have been revealing the blue straggler
population and their variable counterparts (SX Phe stars) are the ACS Survey of Galactic Globular
Clusters [418] and the Cluster AgeS Experiment (CASE) [76]. For a good description of surveys that use
far-ultraviolet in detecting these objects, see Knigge [266]. For somewhat older but still valuable reviews
on the implications of blue stragglers on the dynamics of globular clusters, see Hut [236] and
Bailyn [25].
The globular cluster population of white dwarfs can be used to determine the ages of globular
clusters [343], and so they have been the focus of targeted searches despite the fact that they are arguably
the faintest electromagnetically detectable objects in globular clusters. These searches have yielded large
numbers of globular cluster white dwarfs. For example, a recent search of
Centauri has revealed over
2000 white dwarfs [344
], while Hansen et al. [191
] have detected 222 white dwarfs in M4. Deep ACS
observations of NGC 6397 [411] have identified a substantial population of approximately 150 white
dwarfs [453]. Dieball et al. [107] have found approximately 30 white dwarfs and about 60 probably
cataclysmic variables and white dwarf binaries in M80. In general, however, these searches uncover single
white dwarfs. Optical detection of white dwarfs in binary systems tends to rely on properties of
the accretion process related to the binary type. Therefore, searches for cataclysmic variables
(CVs, see Section 3.1) generally focus on low-luminosity X-ray sources [251
, 179
, 470
] and
on ultraviolet-excess stars [104
, 105
, 177, 269
, 319
], but these systems are usually a white
dwarf accreting from a low mass star. The class of “non-flickerers” which have been detected
recently [82
, 459
] have been explained as He white dwarfs in binaries containing dark CO white
dwarfs [116
, 180
, 190, 454].
Pulsars, although easily seen in radio, are difficult to detect when they occur in hard binaries, due to the
Doppler shift of the pulse intervals. Thanks to an improved technique known as an “acceleration
search” [328], which assumes a constant acceleration of the pulsar during the observation period, more
short-orbital-period binary pulsars are being discovered [62, 64, 88, 90, 133, 140, 400]. For a good review
and description of this technique, see Lorimer [296
]. The progenitors of the ultracompact millisecond
pulsars (MSPs) are thought to pass through a low-mass X-ray binary phase [100
, 179
, 246
, 401, 405
]
(LMXBs, see Section 3.2). These systems are very bright and when they are in an active state,
they can be seen anywhere in the Galactic globular cluster system. There are, however, several
additional LMXBs that are currently quiescent [179
, 207, 471
, 185
, 184
] (qLMXBs). As these
systems turn on, they can be added to the list of known LMXBs, which is currently at 15 [202
].
Additional evidence of a binary spin-up phase for MSPs comes from measurements of their
masses, which indicate a substantial mass-transfer phase during the spin-up. Several observed
globular cluster MSPs in binary systems are seen to have masses above the canonical mass of
[135].
Although there are many theoretical predictions of the existence of black holes in globular clusters (see,
e.g., [334, 388
, 333, 91]), these have generally predicted that only a small number would be retained in the
cluster. Prior to the recent discovery of two black hole binaries in M22 [451
], there have been only a few
observational hints of their existence. Measurements of the kinematics of the cores of M15 [145, 183],
NGC 6752 [113], and
Centauri [357
] provide some suggestions of a large, compact mass. One
proposed explanation would be a large black hole of
in the cluster core. Black holes
in this mass range are much larger than stellar mass black holes (
) but much
smaller than the supermassive black holes (
) found in galactic centers. As such they are
called intermediate mass black holes (IMBH) and may potentially form through mergers of
stars or stellar-mass black holes in globular clusters. However, these observations can also be
explained without requiring an IMBH [314
, 367] and the existence of such objects is questionable.
Furthermore,
Centauri may be the stripped core of a dwarf galaxy. Therefore, any large black
hole in its center may have arisen by other, non-dynamical means. VLA observations of M80,
M62, and M15 do not indicate any significant evidence of radio emission, which can be used to
place some limits on the likelihood of an accreting black hole in these clusters. While radio
observations have provided the strongest limit on the mass of any IMBH in M15, M19, and
M22 [452]. However, uncertainties in the expected gas density makes it difficult to place any upper
limits on a black hole mass [32
]. Recent observations of the kinematics of NGC 2808 [302] and
NGC 6388 [303
] have placed upper bounds of
on any IMBH in their cores. The unusual
millisecond pulsar in the outskirts of NGC 6752 has also been argued to be the result of a dynamical
interaction with a possible binary intermediate mass black hole in the core [80
]. If the velocity
dispersion in globular clusters follows the same correlation to black hole mass as in galactic
bulges, then there may be black holes with masses in the range
in many globular
clusters [493, 297]. Recent Hubble Space Telescope observations of the stellar dynamics in the core of
47 Tuc have placed an upper bound of
for any intermediate mass black hole in this
cluster [322
]. Stellar mass black hole binaries may also be visible as low luminosity X-ray sources,
but if they are formed in exchange interactions, they will have very low duty cycles and hence
are unlikely to be seen [254]. For a good recent review on neutron stars and black holes in
globular clusters, see Rasio et al. [406]. Heinke [202] has an excellent review of X-ray observations
of Galactic globular clusters, including CVs, LMXBs and qLMXBs, MSPs, and other active
binaries.
Recent observations and catalogs of known binaries are presented in the following sections.
3.1 Cataclysmic variables
Cataclysmic variables (CVs) are white dwarfs accreting matter from a companion that is usually a dwarf
star or another white dwarf. They have been detected in globular clusters through identification of the
white dwarf itself or through evidence of the accretion process. White dwarfs managed to avoid detection
until observations with the Hubble Space Telescope revealed photometric sequences in several globular
clusters [83, 82, 366, 408, 409, 410, 459
, 191]. Spectral identification of white dwarfs in globular
clusters has begun both from the ground with the VLT [342, 343] and in space with the Hubble
Space Telescope [82
, 116
, 459
, 344]. With spectral identification, it will be possible to identify
those white dwarfs in hard binaries through Doppler shifts in the
line. This approach has
promise for detecting a large number of the expected double white dwarf binaries in globular
clusters. Photometry has also begun to reveal orbital periods [349, 115
, 255] of CVs in globular
clusters.
Accretion onto the white dwarf builds up a layer of hydrogen-rich material that may eventually lead to
a dwarf nova outburst as the layer undergoes a thermonuclear runaway. These dwarf novae
cause an increase in luminosity of a factor of a few to a few hundred. Identifications of globular
cluster CVs have been made through such outbursts in the cores of M5 [319], 47 Tuc [365],
NGC 6624 [431
], M15 [428
], and M22 [16
, 58]. With the exception of V101 in M5 [319], original
searches for dwarf novae performed with ground based telescopes proved unsuccessful. This is
primarily due to the fact that crowding obscured potential dwarf novae up to several core radii
outside the center of the cluster [425, 427]. Since binaries tend to settle into the core, it is not
surprising that none were found significantly outside of the core. Subsequent searches using
the improved resolution of the Hubble Space Telescope eventually revealed a few dwarf novae
close to the cores of selected globular clusters [424, 426, 431, 428, 16]. To date, there have
been 14 found [374, 423], using the Hubble Space Telescope and Las Campanas Observatory
(CASE).
A more productive approach has been to look for direct evidence of the accretion around the white dwarf.
This can be in the form of excess UV emission and strong emission [124
, 178, 269
, 270, 104
] from
the accretion disk. This technique has resulted in the discovery of candidate CVs in 47 Tuc [124, 269],
M92 [126], NGC 2808 [104], NGC 6397 [82
, 116
, 459], and NGC 6712 [125]. The accretion disk
can also be discerned by very soft X-ray emissions. These low luminosity X-ray binaries are
characterized by a luminosity
, which distinguishes them from the low-mass X-ray
binaries with
. Initial explanations of these objects focused on accreting white
dwarfs [24
], and a significant fraction of them are probably CVs [471
, 480
]. There have been 10
identified candidate CVs in NGC 6752 [382
], 15 in NGC 6397 [78], 19 in NGC 6440 [381
], 2 in
Cen [147
], 5 in Terzan 5 [204
], 22 in 47 Tuc [114
], 5 in M80 [206
], 7 in M54 [399], 2 – 5 in
NGC 288 [273], 4 in M30 [301], 4 in NGC 2808 [422], 1 in M71 [227], and 1 in M4 [33
]. However,
some of the more energetic sources may be LMXBs in quiescence [471
], or even candidate QSO
sources [33].
The state of the field at this time is one of rapid change as Chandra results come in and optical counterparts are found for the new X-ray sources. A living catalog of CVs was created by Downes et al. [108], but it has been allowed to lapse and is now archival [109, 110]. It may still be the best source for confirmed CVs in globular clusters up to 2006.
3.2 Low-mass X-ray binaries
The X-ray luminosities of low-mass X-ray binaries are in the range . The upper
limit is close to the Eddington limit for accretion onto a neutron star, so these systems must
contain an accreting neutron star or black hole. All of the LMXBs in globular clusters contain an
accreting neutron star as they also exhibit X-ray bursts, indicating thermonuclear flashes on the
surface of the neutron star [251
]. Compared with
100 such systems in the galaxy, there
are 15 LMXBs known in globular clusters. The globular cluster system contains roughly 0.1%
of the mass of the galaxy and roughly 10% of the LMXBs. Thus, LMXBs are substantially
over-represented in globular clusters. Within the Galactic globular cluster system, high metallicity
clusters are more likely to host an LMXB, as noted by Grindlay in 1993 [176] and Bellazzini in
1995 [50].
Because these systems are so bright in X-rays, the globular cluster population is completely known – we
expect new LMXBs to be discovered in the globular cluster system only as quiescent (qLMXBs) and
transient systems become active. The 15 sources are in 12 separate clusters. Five have orbital periods
greater than a few hours, six ultracompact systems have measured orbital periods less than one hour, and
four have undetermined orbital periods. A member of the ultracompact group, 4U 1820–30 (X1820–303) in
the globular cluster NGC 6624, has an orbital period of 11 minutes [447]. This is one of the shortest
known orbital periods of any binary and most certainly indicates a degenerate companion.
The orbital period, X-ray luminosity, and host globular clusters for these systems are given in
Table 1.
The improved resolution of Chandra allows for the possibility of identifying optical counterparts to
LMXBs. If an optical counterpart can be found, a number of additional properties and constraints for these
objects can be determined through observations in other wavelengths. In particular, the orbital parameters
and the nature of the secondary can be determined. So far, optical counterparts have been found for
X0512–401 in NGC 1851 [224], X1745–203 in NGC 6440 [473], X1746–370 in NGC 6441 [99], X1830–303
in NGC 6624 [265], X1832–330 in NGC 6652 [100, 203
], X1850–087 in NGC 6712 [84, 26, 354],
X1745–248 in Terzan 5 [204
], and both LMXBs in NGC 7078 [20, 485
]. Continued X-ray observations will
also further elucidate the nature of these systems [347].
LMXB Name |
Cluster
|
![]() |
![]() |
Ref.
|
(
![]() |
(hr)
|
|||
X0512–401 | NGC 1851 | 1.9 | 0.28 | [100![]() ![]() |
X1724–307a | Terzan 2 | 4.3 | — | [100![]() ![]() |
X1730–335 | Liller 1 | 2.2 | — | [100![]() ![]() |
X1732–304 | Terzan 1 | 0.5 | — | [100![]() ![]() |
X1745–203 | NGC 6440 | 0.9 | 8.7 | [100![]() ![]() |
CX-2 | NGC 6440 | 1.5 – 0.4 | 0.96 | [208, 11] |
X1745–248 | Terzan 5 | — | — | [100![]() |
J17480–2446 | Terzan 5 | 37 | 21.25 | [59, 332] |
X1746–370 | NGC 6441 | 7.6 | 5.70 | [100![]() ![]() ![]() |
X1747–313 | Terzan 6 | 3.4 | 12.36 | [100![]() ![]() ![]() |
X1820–303 | NGC 6624 | 40.6 | 0.19 | [100![]() ![]() ![]() |
X1832–330 | NGC 6652 | 2.2 | 0.73 | [100![]() ![]() |
X1850–087 | NGC 6712 | 0.8 | 0.33 | [100![]() ![]() ![]() |
X2127+119-1 | NGC 7078 | 3.5 | 17.10 | [100![]() ![]() ![]() |
X2127+119-2 | NGC 7078 | 1.4 | 0.38 | [100, 379, 485, 106] |
The 15 bright LMXBs are thought to be active members of a larger population of lower luminosity
quiescent low mass X-ray binaries (qLMXBs) [486]. Early searches performed with ROSAT data (which had
a detection limit of
) revealed roughly 30 sources in 19 globular clusters [251]. A more
recent census of the ROSAT low luminosity X-ray sources, published by Verbunt [470], lists
26 such sources that are probably related to globular clusters. Recent observations with the
improved angular resolution of Chandra have begun to uncover numerous low luminosity X-ray
candidates for CVs [179, 180, 203, 225, 204, 206
, 114, 115, 147, 382, 381]. For a reasonably
complete discussion of recent observations of qLMXBs in globular clusters, see Verbunt and
Lewin [471
] or Webb and Barret [480] and references therein. Table 2 lists the 27 qLMXBs known to
date.
qLMXB Name | Cluster | Ref. |
171411–293159 | NGC 6304 | [185![]() |
171421–292917 | NGC 6304 | [185![]() |
171433–292747 | NGC 6304 | [185![]() |
No. 3 | ![]() |
[185![]() ![]() |
Ga | M13 | [185![]() ![]() |
X5 | 47 Tuc | [185![]() ![]() |
X7 | 47 Tuc | [185![]() ![]() |
No. 24 | M28 | [185![]() ![]() |
A-1 | M30 | [185![]() ![]() |
U24 | NGC 6397 | [185![]() ![]() |
CX2 | M80 | [185![]() ![]() |
CX6 | M80 | [185![]() ![]() |
C2 | NGC 2808 | [185![]() |
16 | NGC 3201 | [185] |
CX1 | NGC 6440 | [206![]() |
CX2 | NGC 6440 | [206![]() |
CX3 | NGC 6440 | [206![]() |
CX5 | NGC 6440 | [206![]() |
CX7 | NGC 6440 | [206![]() |
CX10 | NGC 6440 | [206![]() |
CX12 | NGC 6440 | [206![]() |
CX13 | NGC 6440 | [206![]() |
W2 | Terzan 5 | [206![]() |
W3 | Terzan 5 | [206![]() |
W4 | Terzan 5 | [206![]() |
W8 | Terzan 5 | [206] |
J180916-255623 | NGC 6553 | [184] |
3.3 Millisecond pulsars
The population of known millisecond pulsars (MSPs) is one of the fastest growing populations of relativistic
binaries in globular clusters. Several ongoing searches continue to reveal millisecond pulsars in a number of
globular clusters. Previous searches have used deep multi-frequency imaging to estimate the population of
pulsars in globular clusters [140]. In this approach, the expected number of pulsars beaming toward the
earth,
, is determined by the total radio luminosity observed when the radio beam width is
comparable in diameter to the core of the cluster. If the minimum pulsar luminosity is
and the total
luminosity observed is
, then, with simple assumptions on the neutron star luminosity function,




Current searches include the following: Arecibo, which is searching over 22 globular clusters [214]; Green
Bank Telescope (GBT), which is working both alone and in conjunction with Arecibo [249, 214];
the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT), which is searching over about 10 globular
clusters [134]; and Parkes, which is searching over 60 globular clusters [89]. Although these searches
have been quite successful, they are still subject to certain selection effects such as distance,
dispersion measure, and acceleration in compact binaries [63
]. For an excellent review of the
properties of all pulsars in globular clusters, see the review by Camilo and Rasio [63] and references
therein. The properties of known pulsars in binary systems with orbital period less than one
day are listed in Table 3, which has been extracted from the online catalog maintained by
Freire [397].
With the ongoing searches, it can be reasonably expected that the number of millisecond pulsars in binary systems in globular clusters will continue to grow in the coming years.

Pulsar |
![]() |
Cluster
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(ms)
|
(days)
|
(
![]() |
|||
J0024–7204I | 3.485 | 47 Tuc | 0.229 | < 0.0004 | 0.015 |
J0023–7203J | 2.101 | 47 Tuc | 0.121 | < 0.00004 | 0.024 |
J0024–7204O | 2.643 | 47 Tuc | 0.136 | < 0.00016 | 0.025 |
J0024–7204P | 3.643 | 47 Tuc | 0.147 | — | 0.02 |
J0024–7204R | 3.480 | 47 Tuc | 0.066 | — | 0.030 |
J0024–7203U | 4.343 | 47 Tuc | 0.429 | 0.000015 | 0.14 |
J0024–7204V | 4.810 | 47 Tuc | 0.227 | — | 0.34(?) |
J0024–7204W | 2.352 | 47 Tuc | 0.133 | — | 0.14 |
J0024–7204Y | 2.196 | 47 Tuc | 0.522 | — | 0.16 |
J1518+0204C | 2.484 | M5 | 0.087 | — | 0.038 |
J1641+3627D | 3.118 | M13 | 0.591 | — | 0.18 |
J1641+3627E | 2.487 | M13 | 0.118 | — | 0.02 |
J1701–3006B | 3.594 | M62 | 0.145 | < 0.00007 | 0.14 |
J1701–3006C | 3.806 | M62 | 0.215 | < 0.00006 | 0.08 |
J1701–3006E | 3.234 | M62 | 0.16 | — | 0.035 |
J1701–3006F | 2.295 | M62 | 0.20 | — | 0.02 |
B1718–19 | 1004.03 | NGC 6342 | 0.258 | < 0.005 | 0.13 |
J1748–2446A | 11.563 | Terzan 5 | 0.076 | — | 0.10 |
J1748–2446M | 3.569 | Terzan 5 | 0.443 | — | 0.16 |
J1748–2446N | 8.667 | Terzan 5 | 0.386 | 0.000045 | 0.56 |
J1748–2446O | 1.677 | Terzan 5 | 0.259 | — | 0.04 |
J1748–2446P | 1.729 | Terzan 5 | 0.363 | — | 0.44 |
J1748–2446V | 2.073 | Terzan 5 | 0.504 | — | 0.14 |
J1748–2446ae | 3.659 | Terzan 5 | 0.171 | — | 0.019 |
J1748-2446ai | 21.228 | Terzan 5 | 0.851 | 0.44 | 0.57 |
J1748–2021D | 13.496 | NGC6440 | 0.286 | — | 0.14 |
J1807–2459A | 3.059 | NGC 6544 | 0.071 | — | 0.010 |
J1824–2452G | 5.909 | M28 | 0.105 | — | 0.011 |
J1824–2452H | 4.629 | M28 | 0.435 | — | 0.2 |
J1824-2452I | 3.932 | M28 | 0.459 | — | 0.2 |
J1824–2452J | 4.039 | M28 | 0.097 | — | 0.015 |
J1824–2452L | 4.100 | M28 | 0.226 | — | 0.022 |
J1836–2354A | 3.354 | M22 | 0.203 | — | 0.020 |
J1905+0154A | 3.193 | NGC6749 | 0.813 | — | 0.09 |
J1911–5958A | 3.266 | NGC 6752 | 0.837 | < 0.00001 | 0.22 |
J1911+0102A | 3.619 | NGC 6760 | 0.141 | < 0.00013 | 0.02 |
J1953+1846A | 4.888 | M71 | 0.177 | — | 0.032 |
B2127+11C | 30.529 | M 15 | 0.335 | 0.681 | 1.13 |
J2140–2310A | 11.019 | M30 | 0.174 | < 0.00012 | 0.11 |
3.4 Black holes
Radio observations of M22 have revealed two stellar mass black holes with likely low-mass stellar
companions [451]. These objects have flat radio spectra, but no observed X-ray emission. As
such, they are likely to be undergoing very low level accretion from their companions. Mass
estimates put these black holes at . There have been no confirmed observations of
X-ray black hole binaries in Galactic globular clusters. All of the Galactic globular cluster high
luminosity LMXBs exhibit the X-ray variability that is indicative of nuclear burning on the surface
of a neutron star. It is possible that some of the recently discovered low luminosity LMXBs
may house black holes instead of neutron stars [471], it is more likely that they are simply
unusual neutron star LMXBs in quiescence [486]. Finally, there is very circumstantial evidence
for the possible existence of an intermediate mass black hole (IMBH) binary in NGC 6752
based upon an analysis of the MSP binary PSR A [79, 80]. Further evidence for black holes
in globular clusters will probably have to wait for the next generation of gravitational wave
detectors.
3.5 Extragalactic globular clusters
Recently, the X-ray observatories XMM-Newton, Chandra, and Swift have been combined with HST observations to search for extragalactic globular cluster binaries. These have yielded a number of systems found in M31, M104, NGC 1399, NGC 3379, NGC 4278, NGC 4472, and NGC 4697.
Three super soft X-ray sources have been found in M31 globular clusters [212, 375, 213
]. Super soft
sources have little or no radiation at energies above 1 keV and have a blackbody spectrum corresponding to
temperatures between
to
. These are assumed to be from classical novae, and two
have been associated with optical novae [212, 213]. Stiele et al. [448] have found 36 LMXBs and 17
candidate LMXBs that are co-located with M31 globular clusters, while Peacock et al. [368] claim 41
LMXBs in 11% of the M31 globular clusters. Barnard et al. [31] have found 4 black hole X-ray binaries
associated with M31 globulars. Finally, there is the suspected intermediate mass black hole in
G1 [17, 102].
The X-ray luminosity function (XLF) of the population of LMXB’s in individual galaxies has been found
to obey a power law with a slope in the range of 1.8 to 2.2 [164, 258]. When the XLF’s for many
galaxies are combined, a broken power law provides a better fit [258
]. At the break luminosity of
, the XLF steepens to a slope consistent with
. The break luminosity is near the
Eddington luminosity for a
accretor. The XLFs for several individual galaxies are shown in
Figure 7
and the combined XLFs from Kim and Fabbiano [258
] are shown in Figure 8
. When the
globular cluster XLF is separated from the field XLF, we see a dramatic drop in the number of
low luminosity LMXBs for the globular cluster population, indicative of a different formation
mechanism [477, 492].

Searches for bright X-ray sources in other nearby galaxies have yielded LMXB’s thought
to contain black holes based on their luminosity. There are 2 in NGC 1399 [432, 243, 313
],
and Paolillo et al. [364] estimate that 65% of globular clusters in NGC 1399 host LMXBs.
Brassington et al. [60] have found 3 LMXBs in globular clusters associated with NGC 3379, of which
1 is a presumed black hole. Fabbiano et al. [120] have found 4 LMXBs in globular clusters
associated with NGC 4278, all of which are bright enough to be black holes. Maccarone and
collaborators [308, 310] have found 2 LMXBs containing black holes in NGC 4472 globular clusters.
Kim et al. [259] claim 75 globular clusters LMXBs in NGC 3379, NGC 4278, and NGC 4697.
Finally, Li et al. [293] have found 41 X-ray sources that are presumably LMXBs in globular
clusters in M104. The extragalactic LMXBs have been found to follow the same trend toward
over-representation in red (or metal rich) globular clusters [440
, 282, 307, 261, 283], as can be seen in
Figure 9
.