6.1 Integrability properties of Killing fields
Our aim here is to discuss the circularity problem in some more detail. We refer the reader to
Section 2.1 and Section 3.5 for the general context and for references concerning the staticity and the
circularity issues. In both cases, the task is to use the symmetry properties of the matter model in order to
establish the Frobenius integrability conditions for the Killing field(s). The link between the relevant
components of the stress-energy tensor and the integrability conditions is provided by a general identity for
the derivative of the twist of a Killing field
, say,
and Einstein’s equations, implying
.
For a stationary and axisymmetric spacetime with Killing fields (one-forms)
and
, Eq. (49)
implies
and similarly for
.
By virtue of Eq. (50) – and the fact that the Frobenius condition
can be written as
– the circularity problem is reduced to the following two tasks:
(i) Show that
implies
.
(ii) Establish
from the stationary and axisymmetric matter equations.
(i) Since
is a function, it must be constant if its derivative vanishes. As
vanishes on the
rotation axis, this implies
in every domain of spacetime intersecting the axis. (At this point
it is worthwhile to recall that the corresponding step in the staticity theorem requires more effort:
Concluding from
that
vanishes is more involved, since
is a one-form. However, using
Stoke’s theorem to integrate an identity for the twist [88
] shows that a strictly stationary –
not necessarily simply connected – domain of outer communication must be static if
is
closed.)
(ii) While
follows from the symmetry conditions for electro-magnetic fields [27] and
for scalar fields [86], it cannot be established for non-Abelian gauge fields [88]. This implies that the usual
foliation of spacetime used to integrate the stationary and axisymmetric Maxwell equations
is too restrictive to treat the Einstein–Yang–Mills (EYM) system. This is seen as follows: In
Section (4.4) we have derived the formula (22). By virtue of Eq. (10) this becomes an expression for
the derivative of the twist in terms of the electric Yang–Mills potential
(defined with
respect to the stationary Killing field
) and the magnetic one-form
:
Contracting this relation with the axial Killing field
, and using again the fact that the Lie derivative of
with respect to
vanishes, yields immediately
The difference between the Abelian and the non-Abelian case lies in the circumstance
that the Maxwell equations automatically imply that the
-component of
vanishes,
whereas this does not follow from the Yang–Mills equations. Moreover, the latter do not imply that the Lie
algebra valued scalars
and
are orthogonal. Hence, circularity is a generic property of the
Einstein–Maxwell (EM) system, whereas it imposes additional requirements on non-Abelian gauge
fields.
Both the staticity and the circularity theorems can be established for scalar fields or, more generally,
scalar mappings with arbitrary target manifolds: Consider a self-gravitating scalar mapping
with Lagrangian
. The stress energy tensor is of the form
where the functions
and
may depend on
,
, the spacetime metric
and the target
metric
. If
is invariant under the action of a Killing field
– in the sense that
for
each component
of
– then the one-form
becomes proportional to
:
. By
virtue of the Killing field identity (49), this implies that the twist of
is closed. Hence, the staticity and
the circularity issue for self-gravitating scalar mappings reduce to the corresponding vacuum problems.
From this one concludes that stationary non-rotating black hole configuration of self-gravitating
scalar fields are static if
, while stationary and axisymmetric ones are circular if
.